Attack after attack. More and more death, destruction and misery. More and more blood flows. We have watched as all over the world, countries, France imparticular, and citizens are being ruthlessly targeted and slaughtered. As intelligent, reality thinking Americans, we know who or what is responsible, but in most cases we are fed a line of 'It's a hate crime' or 'It's workplace violence' or some such lame excuse. But, I am also at odds with the term 'Radical Islamist'. As I have seen, none have been the typical ideal of 'radical', UNTIL they commit their Jihad. I'll never claim to be an expert on the Muslim faith, but I do know to be faithful, you must follow the mantra, in this case the Quran. In this, they are directed to befriend the infidel before smiting him. So, in my view, 'Radical' isn't an accurate description either. We, plain and simply, do not know who or when a Muslim will do something, nor, does it seem that we know if or how they are directed to engage. Those are the facts, offensive or not, they are the facts. We do not know. Yes, we have caught a few, but for each one caught, there x number of others not caught. Even if x is equal to 1, that is 1 too many. As we have seen, a lone wolf attack can be and is devastating.
Then, we constantly hear the leftist argument of us being racist or bigoted and trying to force the idea that Islam is a religion. 'Muslim' is not a race, as there are Muslim from all corners of the world, i.e., Chinese Muslims, Pakistanian Muslims, etc., and Islam is not a religion as no religion would advocate for the killing of another human nor the destruction of any civilization, most especially in the manners described in their Quran. Though I agree it is an ideology, that term in itself is a generalization. To my way of thinking, Islam is a politically based ideology of colonization and rule. As you may know, to colonize a chosen land, you must either enslave or eradicate the existing populous.
I have been asked why does there seem to be so many Muslims, and/or radical Islamists, going into almost every country around the globe. Well, it is the premise of cultural perpetuation. Meaning, in basic language, it's the ratio of offspring to parents that grow a culture. You need a reproduction rate of 2.11 children to continually perpetuate any culture for more than 25 years, anything below this rate will not be sufficient in doing this. If a reproduction rate is 1.3, to reverse it(which has never been done) would take 80 to 100 years and there is no economic model that would sustain a culture for that amount of time. As an example, The reproduction rate of an American family is 1.6 but with the Latino influx that rate increases to 2.11, the reproduction rate of a French family is 1.8, for Greece it's 1.3. The entire European Union of 31 countries has an average of 1.38 reproduction rate. But, even with these fertility rates, the populations are not decreasing because of Muslim immigration, both, legal and illegal. Muslims believe in multiple wives with multiple children to each wife, which, in turn, increases their reproduction rate to 8.1 children. In this case, the culture of Muslims, and/or radical Muslims, is not only sustained, but vastly increases their numbers. Hence, the seemingly endless hoards of Muslims moving across nearly all lands.
We have witnessed, around the globe, the violence enacted and encouraged by Muslims. Why? It's the basis of their politically based ideology of colonization and rule, leading to their ultimate goal of establishing a world wide caliphate. You've all heard their motto, 'Leave, Convert or Die'. Another point often made is that Muslim have and do kill other Muslims. Yes, that is true, and for several reasons. The Sunni's and Shiite's have been at war with one another for one simple reason, they are in conflict for the ability to lead the world wide caliphate. Each one thinks they should be the one's to do so. Hence, they will kill one another until one is either eradicated or submits. Leaving the other to establish their authority. Another reason for a Muslim to kill another could be one of many reasons, i.e., leaving the brotherhood basically making them an infidel, doing something that is against their beliefs, etc. A woman will be severely beaten and/or killed by one of many ways for the slightest infraction, being raped, walking alone, etc.
But, in their Quran, it is written that some of these teachings may be broken for the reason of befriending the infidel to gain his trust before smiting him.
In our own government, we have Muslims in office, just a few examples are;
*John Brennan, current head of the CIA converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia.
*Obama's top adviser, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim who was born in Iran where her parents still live.
*Hillary Clinton's top adviser, Huma Abedin is a Muslim, whose mother and brother are involved in the now outlawed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
*Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim.
*Homeland Security Adviser, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim.
*Obama adviser and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim.
*Obama's Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America is a Muslim..
*Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim.
*Jan 2015; Nancy Pelosi announced she will appoint Rep Andre Carson, D-Ind, as the first Muslim lawmaker on the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. It would make Carson the first Muslim to serve on the committee that receives intelligence on the threat of Islamic militants in the Middle East! He has suggested that U.S. schools should be modeled after Islamic madrassas, where
education is based on the Quran!!!
*Our closet Muslim himself, Barack Hussein Obama. It's questionable if Obama ever officially took the oath of office when he was sworn in. He didn't repeat the oath properly to defend our nation and our Constitution. Later, the Democrats claimed, he was given the oath again in private.
*CIA director John Brennan took his oath on a copy of the Constitution, not a Bible..??
*Valarie Jarret wrote her college thesis on how she wanted to change America into a Muslim friendly nation and she is an Obama top advisor.
*Congressman, Keith Ellison took his oath on a copy of the Quran.
We are approaching a point where we will have to do what is necessary to save, not only our country, but ourselves as well. Ask yourself...What would you do in case of an emergency, be it, natural, human or any other form? Do you know how to live without the modern conveniences? Could you find and/or capture, food, be it animal or plant? Can you find water, and do you know what to do with it after you find it? Can you build a long term shelter? Do you have provisions, a bug out bag, set aside for just such an occasion? Do you have any medical knowledge? Do you have a guns or guns, a knife? And, as far as I'm concerned, the most important question, do you have the will? These, and so many more questions, should be, no....need to be, not only, asked of yourself, but also answered, honestly.
I don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, although I'm sure I do, but I fully believe it is better to have it and never need it, than to need it and not have it. You could use the spare tire in your car as an analogy. It is something always carried along, although, you may never need it. But, if you do get a flat tire, isn't better to have it there? There is a quote, one of my favorites, as it can be applied to many different circumstances, 'I would rather die on my feet, Fighting; than to die on my knees, begging'. By executing some field preparedness, you are fulfilling both lines of thought. Those with the will, knowledge and aptitude to survive are, indeed, fighting.
I wrote something a long while ago that pertains to this, because this is where the breakdown begins...Have we, the American populous, with all the distractions in life, i.e., sports, monetary gains, electronics, etc., have we been so engulfed in ourselves, our wants and perceived needs, that we have allowed those that are suppose to govern us an unabated altering of power...a reverse of roles, perhaps. Have we, over time, allowed our great nation be molested and corrupted by those very people who claim to love this land? The answer, Yes, we have. We have faltered in our duty to maintain the status quo as it regards to the implementation and power of Government. We have allowed it to become something more resembling a Monarchy or Dictatorship than a government for the people, by the people and of the people. The failed ideology of liberalism has sprung up and poisoned those who's minds are weak and easily manipulated. Which, in turn, has lead to the corruption of morals, respect, patriotism, love of a country and citizens. Citizens, who established and continually protected the freedoms and rights we have, in the past, enjoyed. Freedoms and rights that are being whittled away at, small piece by small piece. We have become only a patch of what we once were and of what we could be again.
We will soon come to a point where we must stand or be stood upon. Choose wisely....
